スポンサーサイト

上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。
-- ----- スポンサー広告

Agree or disagree: Ordinary citizens should be involved in trials as a judicial panel

POINTS
■The duty of confidentiality
■The security of judicial panels
■Mandatory attendance
■The rapidness of trials
■The reflection of public opinions
■False accusation

【original】

Some people are opposed to the introduction of the citizen judge system, because they are not ready for it. I believe, however, that people should participate in trials as a citizen judge.
First, the lay judge system can reflect public opinions to sentences. Generally, the judges decide a sentence in accordance with precedent, but lay jurors can bring new ideas and perspective on their decisions. New trials can include more "common sense" in sentences than ever.
Second, people will pay more attention to trials and crimes. It is mandatory to attend the trial if they are chosen as a citizen judge, thus many people have been more conscious about crimes and trials occur in their society. It is a good opportunity for us to know what happens around us and how to solve these problems.
Finally, the lay judge system can lead trials more rapidly than ever.In the past, trials dragged on for months or years. The longer it takes time, the more it costs. The rapidness of trials can save money which originally comes from our tax.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the idea that people should take part in trials as a lay juror. It will lead us understand the justice system more.

206words




【corrected】

Some people are opposed to the introduction of the citizen judge system, because they are not ready for it . I believe, however, that people should participate in trials as a citizen judge.
First, the lay judge system can reflect public opinions to sentences. Generally, the judges decide a sentence in accordance with precedent, but lay jurors can bring new ideas and perspective on their decisions. New trials can include more "common sense" in sentences than ever.
Second, people will pay more attention to trials and crimes. It is mandatory to attend the trial if they are chosen as a citizen judge, thus many people have been will be more conscious about crimes and trials occurring in their society. It is a good opportunity for us to know what happens around us and how to solve these problems.
Finally, the lay judge system can lead trials more rapidly lead to trials being more rapid than ever. In the past, trials dragged on for months or years. The longer it takes in time, the more it costs. The rapidness of trials can save money which originally comes from our tax.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the idea that people should take part in trials as a lay juror. It will lead us to understand the justice system more.
スポンサーサイト

テーマ:頑張れ自分。 - ジャンル:日記

19 01-2010 essay Trackback:0Comment:0

コメント

コメントの投稿


管理者にだけ表示を許可する

トラックバック URL
http://rincorinco.blog91.fc2.com/tb.php/48-7250d802
この記事にトラックバックする(FC2ブログユーザー)
 
上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。